Self-Reflection Paper (50 points possible) In your Preparation Notes, you mentio

Self-Reflection Paper
(50 points possible)
In your Preparation Notes, you mentioned at least three interpersonal communication or group facilitation skills you planned to work on or observe as you facilitated your ‘Round Two’ discussion in your small group. As you reflect on the experience of facilitating, discuss at least three interpersonal communication or group facilitation skills that emerged and were evident. These may be different than you anticipated.
Did you find yourself working on, struggling with, or excelling in a communication or facilitation skill you did not expect?
Did you notice communication skills among the group members you want to discuss? Think about these things as you reflect on this experience.
Is there anything you wish you would have done differently during the Round Two facilitation or even during practice?
Remember to highlight what went well and how you have grown through this experience!
Write in the first person (using “I”) and articulate your thoughts, feelings, and behaviors through your facilitation experience. Your paper should be no more (or less) than 2-3 pages in length, double-spaced with 1” margins, 12pt standard font, and submitted as an MS Word document (or pdf) on Canvas.
Grading Rubric (see detailed version below as well)Points
Three communication or group facilitation skills you used or observed
12
Personal learning (thoughts, feelings, behaviors as you facilitated discussion)
10
What you could have done differently (ways you could improve)
10
What you did well (how you have grown through this experience)
10
Grammar, spelling, mechanics, format, length, submission
8
TOTAL50
Rubric
Self Reflection Paper
Self Reflection Paper
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThree communication or group facilitation skills you used or observed
12 to >11.25 ptsWell Done
Three concepts/skills identified that were evident during the facilitation to observer as well. Student also offers excellent detail from facilitation demonstrating how these concepts/skills were applied and/or observed.
11.25 to >10.0 ptsProficient
Some concepts/skills identified that are relevant but there are not three and/or they are just mentioned but more detail as to how they were used/observed would improve score.
10 to >8.75 ptsNeeds Work
Less than three concepts/skills identified OR one or more identified do not apply OR skills/concepts just named but no or very little detail provided to substantiate how they were used/observed during facilitatation.
8.75 to >0 ptsNot met
Concepts/Skills mentioned do not apply or none mentioned or evidence of plagiarism.
12 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePersonal learning (thoughts, feelings, behaviors as you facilitated discussion
10 to >9.3 ptsWell Done
Very thoughtful, comprehensive, clear, and thorough reflection that demonstrates introspection, insight, and growth.
9.3 to >8.3 ptsProficient
Good job beginning to reflect but more needed to demonstrate insight and growth.
8.3 to >7.3 ptsNeeds Work
Some reflection/comments made, but difficult to pick up on insight, introspection, or growth.
7.3 to >0 ptsNot met
Not enough depth of reflection or nothing mentioned or evidence of plagiarism.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat you did well (how you have grown through this experience)
10 to >9.3 ptsWell Done
Very insightful and thoughtful comments on what went well and how you have grown from this experience.
9.3 to >8.3 ptsProficient
Some thoughts on what went well and how you have grown from this experience, but more needed for full credit.
8.3 to >7.3 ptsNeeds Work
There may be mention of what went well and/or how you have grown from this experience, but much more is needed to demonstrate deeper reflection.
7.3 to >0 ptsNot met
Section is either missing or lacking in detail or there is evidence of plagiarism.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat you could have done differently (ways you could improve)
10 to >9.3 ptsWell Done
Very insightful and thoughtful comments on what you could have done differently during your facilitation and ways you could improve in your facilitation skills.
9.3 to >8.3 ptsProficient
Some thoughts on what you could have done differently and ways you could improve you facilitation skills, but more needed for full credit.
8.3 to >7.3 ptsNeeds Work
There may be mention of what you could have done differently and ways you could improve your facilitation skills, but much more is needed to demonstrate deeper reflection.
7.3 to >0 ptsNot met
Section is either missing or lacking in detail or there is evidence of plagiarism.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, spelling, mechanics, format, length, submission
8 to >7.5 ptsWell Done
No (or very few) errors in grammar, spelling, mechanics; formatted correctly (12-pt standard font, 1″ margins. double-spaced); length is 2-3 pages, submitted on Canvas as instructed.
7.5 to >7.0 ptsSatisfactory
No more than (3) minor errors in grammar, spelling, mechanics, format, and/or submission.
7 to >5.75 ptsNeeds Better Proofreading
More than a few (5+) errors in grammar, spelling, mechanics, format, and/or submission.
5.75 to >0 ptsNot met
Several (10+) errors in grammar, spelling, mechanics, format, length, and/or submission.
8 pts
Total Points: 50
** I will provide all the information needed just need someone to put it all together and write the paper**