Clinical change project topic: Sexual Health and STI prevention Is your clinica

Clinical change project topic: Sexual Health and STI prevention
Is your clinical change project highly significant to nursing? Does the project encompass the core graduate nursing competencies of patient-centered care, social equity, cultural appropriateness, evidence-based practice, health promotion, and disease prevention? Why?.
NURS_691B_DE – APRN Discussion Rubric-V2_ 2/26/19
NURS_691B_DE – APRN Discussion Rubric-V2_ 2/26/19
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInitial Response Timing
1 to >0.0 ptsProficient
On time (posted by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. of the week in which assigned)
0 ptsAcceptable
n/a You will either receive 100 or 0.
0 ptsNeeds Improvement
n/a You will either receive 100 or 0.
0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Late (did not submit by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. of the week in which assigned)
1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence of Critical Thinking: Initial Responses to Discussion Prompt(s)
3 to >2.76 ptsProficient
Applies course content sufficiently by expanding on the main points of the prompt. Responses exhibit critical thinking and analysis. There is a significant correlation to course materials, national guidelines, and evidence-based research.
2.76 to >2.46 ptsAcceptable
Content knowledge is exhibited by identification of the main topics. There is some evidence of critical thinking and analysis. Responses may be insufficient or lacking in detail.
2.46 to >2.25 ptsNeeds Improvement
An understanding of content knowledge is poorly exhibited and insufficient in critical thinking, analysis, and detail. Some main discussion topics are not covered, or they significantly digress from the topic at hand.
2.25 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory
An initial response is missing or provides no indication of understanding. Main topics are not covered.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWord Count Initial Post
0.5 to >0.0 ptsProficient
The initial post is 300 words or more.
0 ptsAcceptable
n/a You will either receive 100 or 0.
0 ptsNeeds Improvement
n/a You will either receive 100 or 0.
0 ptsUnsatisfactory
The initial post has fewer than 300 words.
0.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFrequency of Participation and Minimum Posting Requirements
1 to >0.0 ptsProficient
Responses to peers’ initial posts occur throughout the week with replies to peers and/or instructors present on two or more days. A minimum of 2 replies on 2 separate days per weekly prompt is evident.
0 ptsAcceptable
n/a You will either receive 100 or 0.
0 ptsNeeds Improvement
n/a You will either receive 100 or 0.
0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Responses to peers’ initial posts do not occur throughout the week with replies to peers and/or instructors present on two or more days. Less than a minimum of 2 replies on 2 separate days per weekly prompt is evident.
1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence of Critical Thinking:
Responses to Peers and/or Instructors
3 to >2.76 ptsProficient
Well-developed and insightful replies provide an opportunity for response. Responses promote discussion either by sharing prior knowledge and experiences, making meaningful connections with course content, asking meaningful questions, or challenging viewpoints. There is a significant correlation of student ideas to course materials, national guidelines, and evidence-based research.
2.76 to >2.46 ptsAcceptable
Somewhat developed replies provide some opportunity for response. Responses contribute to the discussion either by sharing prior knowledge and experiences, making connections with course content, or asking questions.
2.46 to >2.25 ptsNeeds Improvement
Poorly developed replies provide little or no opportunity for response. Responses do little to contribute to the discussion.
2.25 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Responses are severely limited; no critical thought is present.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics
1.5 to >1.38 ptsProficient
The writing is clear, concise, formal, and organized. Responses contain a maximum of 2 errors in spelling and grammar. Sources are paraphrased, referenced, and cited correctly in current APA style in all but 1 or 2 instances.
1.38 to >1.23 ptsAcceptable
The writing is generally clear and organized but is not concise or formal in language. Responses contain 3- to 5 errors in spelling and grammar with minor interference with readability or comprehension. Sources are paraphrased, referenced, and cited correctly in current APA in all but 3 or 4 instances.
1.23 to >1.13 ptsNeeds Improvement
The writing is unclear and unorganized. Responses contain more than 5 errors in spelling and grammar that detract from the readability of the paper. Sources are missing or they are improperly cited; APA style is barely evident.
1.13 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Extensive errors in spelling and grammar detract from readability and comprehension, and/or the writing includes slang or is inappropriate for academic discourse. APA style is not evident.
1.5 pts
Total Points: 10