Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to thi

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Hi, the answer already has been completed, which I will provide to you once you are selected to work on the question and just has to be edited based on the following feedback:
Feedback: Please clarify what is the cost to implement an epidemiology center, how much would the state have to fund? How much would it cost to fund the prevention of an ACE program?
I attached the example paper and the instructions and requirements for the assignment below so that you know what its all about 🙂
An example paper is provided, follow the format of it.
Assignment Overview: The memo will be an analysis of 3 policy options according to 2 criteria (cost and effectiveness), addressed to a specific decision-maker. You must compare your policy options with the status quo, clearly explain what policy actions would be taken under each option, analyze the three options according to two appropriate criteria, and make a recommendation based on your analysis. Memos must be written clearly in audience-appropriate language and tailored to their chosen decision-maker.
Instructions: Write a cohesive, well-written paper, not a series of bullet points or stand-alone paragraphs. APA 7th edition citations, at least 3 evidence-based references are used. Be sure to include all components listed.
Topic/ Problem: Fentanyl overdose rates in High School aged students in Houston, Texas
Components (Provide Headings such as Decisionmaker, Problem Identification, etc):
 Decisionmaker
o Identify which decision-maker the memo is being written for and their relevance (Governor of Texas, Greg Abbott)
 Problem Identification
o Identify the question presented to the decision-maker that the memo will answer.
– The problem is clearly defined, including relevance to the decision maker.
– The question presented to the decision-maker for analysis is clearly stated (as a question).
 Background
o Diagnosis of the “causes” of the problem
o Evidence justifying the diagnosis (specific statistics on the population and synthetic fentanyl)
– The memo contains all the necessary information to understand the problem and the analysis of each option.
– Memo does not contain extraneous or irrelevant information.
– The information presented is accurate (use evidence-based research).
– The status quo is clear, including what would happen if no action is taken (discuss programs that are currently in place that have no impact).
 Options
o Identification of 2 criteria (cost and effectiveness)
– Memo explains the relevance of the selected criteria (cost and effectiveness) to the decision maker.
o Description of 3 actions that could be taken to address the problem
o Balanced critique of options using specified criteria (cost and effectiveness)
– Three actions should not currently exist in Texas (research what Texas is currently doing and discuss how it can be changed). It may be an option that another state implements, but must discuss how it would be beneficial for Texas to implement it.
– Criteria are appropriate for the options and are defined (how will you measure cost and effectiveness of each option).
– Options considered address the problem as presented and would reasonably be considered by the decisionmaker.
– Options are sufficiently varied to represent reasonably different courses of action.
– Analysis of options is consistent and balanced. (If doing nothing is an option, it is evaluated equally with the other options.) — Proposed actions are within the power of the decisionmaker.
– Analysis of options by criteria, including any ranking or scoring of the options should be reasonable based on the evidence presented (do not merely list).
 Recommendation of one of the options, with reasoning
– The recommended course of action addresses the problem as presented.
– Why did you select this option as the best choice? Reasons for choice are clear and only one option is recommended.
Requirements: Edit the answer based on the given feedback
3-6 pages, no more than 6 pages not including Title or References pages Times New Roman Size 12 Font Single-Spaced APA Format | .doc file
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.