For the second component of the course project, you will design a program evalua

For the second component of the course project, you will design a program evaluation proposal that includes a plan for implementation and describes in detail how you would collaborate with others to complete the necessary research and evaluation. You will apply the principles of group dynamics relevant to the evaluation in this plan. This will include 8–10 pages of additional content beyond the revised Week 4 content.
Assignment Instructions
Use the template linked in Resources to help you format your assignment.
Title Page: The following information should be included on the title page: Heading with page number, Needs Analysis for Proposed Evaluation of [Program Name], Author, Capella University, PSY5140: Program Evaluation, Date, Instructor.
Follow current APA format per the template. Additional APA support can be found on the Capella Writing Center (links in Resources).
Under the heading Table of Contents:
List the abstract, each heading, the references and appendix title (if any).
Double-space the table of contents, but single-space entries that are longer than one line. All entries should be aligned flush left and their page numbers flush right (with no leader dots). Subheadings should be indented 1 inch.
Introduction: In your own words, generally summarize the program, the challenge the program addresses, the need for evaluation, your design for evaluating it, and your plan for implementing it. Make this as brief, readable, and compelling as possible. (Note: A heading is not used for the introduction in APA format.)
Under the heading Needs Analysis:
Provide a brief overview of the needs analysis provided in the Appendix (the revised Week 4 submission). Include a rationale for completing the program evaluation.
Do not worry about citing your previous work.
Under the heading Data Collection and Analysis:
Assess what types of data are most important and relevant to collect for the evaluation.
Analyze the best sources for data collection.
Assess the best techniques/methods to use for:
Data sampling and collection.
Data analysis.
Provide clear and convincing rationale for all your choices.
Under the heading Implementation Plan:
Describe in detail the processes of collaborating with others to complete the necessary research and evaluation.
Apply principles of group dynamics to plan management of implementation.
Under the heading Standards and Criteria:
Analyze what would be the best standards and criteria for evaluating the program. Be sure to clearly explain why particular choices are superior to the alternatives.
Under the heading Conclusion:
Summarize your proposal and make a final compelling appeal for its implementation.
Attach Appendix [TITLE: Needs Assessment]
Revise the main sections of your Week 4 assignment as necessary, based on feedback you received from your instructor, information from subsequent course studies, and your own reflection. Be sure to include:
Program Stakeholders and Outcomes.
Program Procedures.
Proposed Program Evaluation Overview.
Cost-Benefit Analysis.
Ethical Considerations.
Integrate appropriate references for Appendix with references cited in the body of the Week 8 paper.
Do not worry about citing your previous work.
Throughout this assignment, cite specific concepts, ideas, and program evaluation terminology presented in the course. Support your ideas with relevant references, citations, and empirical research. Be sure to adhere to current APA style and formatting guidelines and include a list of references.
Avoid use of direct quotations—these are not counted in the length of your assignment. Paraphrasing is much preferred because it demonstrates your mastery of the subject.
It is recommended that you read the rubric for this assignment to understand how your work will be assessed.
Assignment Requirements
References: Use a minimum of three recent sources (published within the last six years).
Length: 8–10 pages of double-spaced new content, plus previous assignment content, cover page, references, and any quotations.
Font: 12-point Times New Roman.
Format: Follow current APA style and formatting guidelines; refer to the Capella Writing Center APA links as needed.
HERE IS THE FEEDBACK FROM MY PROFESSOR FOR WEEK 4: As you have chosen to investigate a regional program with federal funding, you will need to provide a lot more detail about specific locations and services available for each one. You only provide a reference for FL locations yet you seem to be discussing this program for all of Georgia. What you have included is good generic information, but it does not provide enough detail for a decision maker to decide to provide funding for this program evaluation project. Please review the corrective feedback for the body of the paper as that is what you will rewrite and submit as the appendix for the unit 8 assignment.*** THE TWO FILES I UPLOADED PERTAIN TO WEEK 4 YOU CAN USE IT THIS WEEK ON THIS ASSIGNMENT IF YOU NEED SO. I UPLOADED SOMETHING YOU NEED FOR THE ASSIGNMENT FEEDBACK BACK FROM MY PROFESSOR SO IT WILL ALL GO WITH THIS WEEK ASSIGNMENT.