Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to thi

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
I will provide the court case required for the assignment once you are selected to work on the question 🙂
IHP 420 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
The final case study for this course will require you to analyze a court decision in which a hospital was found vicariously liable on a theory of apparent authority for professional malpractice in the form of negligence of an independent contractor. You will focus on facts pertaining to the medical standard of care, breach of care, and causation, and you will explain how they were applied to law. You will then use the facts of the case to identify an ethics issue and determine an ethical theory that would help provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient. Next, you will apply a clinician–patient shared decision-making model to describe how the ethics issue could be resolved. You will also include a discussion about possible violations of the code of ethics in your given field. Lastly, you will augment or vary the facts of the case to create a hypothetical scenario that changes the outcome so that the hospital is no longer vicariously liable for professional malpractice in the form of negligence of an independent contractor.
Prompt
In this project, you will continue to analyze the Popovich v. Allina Health System court case involving professional malpractice. For this milestone, you will use the facts from the case to identify an ethics issue, determine an ethical theory that would help provide a safe and quality healthcare experience for the patient, and apply a clinician–patient shared decision-making model.
Ethical Component: In this section, you will evaluate the case to identify the specific ethical issues and determine ethical theories and shared decision- making models that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience. Then, you will propose and defend ethical guidelines for healthcare providers to follow in order to avoid future incidents.Describe the ethical issues that led to the malpractice case and explain why the issues are credited with causing the incident. Support your response with research and relevant examples from the case.
Describe an ethical theory that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient. Support your response with research and relevant examples from the case.
Select a physician–patient shared decision-making model and explain how it would provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient.
Propose ethical guidelines that would have helped prevent the incident and would help the organization prevent future incidents.
Defend how your proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public.
What to Submit
Your paper should be a 2 to 3 full page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, one-inch margins, and at least three sources cited in the most recent APA format. All references should be formatted according to the most recent APA guidelines.
Milestone Two Rubric
CriteriaProficient (100%)Needs Improvement (70%)Not Evident (0%)Value
Ethical Component: Ethical IssuesDescribes the ethical issues that led to the malpractice case and explains why the issues are credited with causing the incident, and supports with research and relevant examplesDescribes the ethical issues that led to the malpractice case and explains why the issues are credited with causing the incident, but description lacks details or does not support with research and relevant examplesDoes not describe the ethical issues that led to the malpractice case and does not explain why the issues are credited with causing the incident18
Ethical Component: Ethical TheoryDescribes an ethical theory that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient, and supports with research and relevant examples from the caseDescribes an ethical theory that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient, but description lacks detail, is illogical, or does not support with research or relevant examplesDoes not describe an ethical theory that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient18
Ethical Component: Shared Decision- Making ModelSelects a physician–patient shared decision-making model and explains how it would provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patientSelects a physician–patient shared decision-making model and explains how it would provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient, but explanation lacks detailDoes not select a physician– patient shared decision-making model and does not explain how it would provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient18
Ethical Component: Ethical GuidelinesProposes ethical guidelines that would have helped prevent the incident and would help the organization prevent future incidentsProposes ethical guidelines that would have helped prevent the incident and would help the organization prevent future incidents, but proposal is cursoryDoes not propose ethical guidelines that would have helped prevent current and future incidents18
Ethical Component: DefendDefends how the proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the publicDefends how the proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public, but defense lacks detail or is illogicalDoes not defend how the proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public18
Articulation of ResponseSubmission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organizationSubmission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideasSubmission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas10
Total:100%
Requirements: 2-3 Full Pages Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to include an introduction paragraph with a clear thesis statement in the last sentence of the introduction paragraph and a conclusion paragraph.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation in each body paragraph.
Please be sure to read, use, and cite the case study that is required for the assignment, which I will provide once you are selected to work on the question. Please be sure that any additional sources used are credible or scholarly sources published within the last 5 years.