For your 4th online discussion, you will examine how our political understanding

For your 4th online discussion, you will examine how our political understandings and connections are changing through globalization. You will analyze the relationship between politics and the nation-state. You will also look at how political ideologies, actions, and institutions are spreading across borders. You can use information from Chapter 4 in Manfred B. Steger’s “Globalization: A very short introduction” to guide your conversation. Also, feel free to bring in relevant insights from Timothy Erik Ström’s book as well.
Background Information
Steger (2020) writes that “traditionally, humans have organized their political differences along territorial lines” (p. 64). Many of our political ideologies, actions, and institutions revolve around the connection we feel to our nation. For example, many people consider it to be is patriotic to vote. It allows us to express a deep sense of belonging to our nation. And yet, the way we understand our national and our political affiliations in society is a socially constructed process. There is no “natural” order to the formation of national borders and political orientations. Steger (2020) writes that “the artificial division of planetary social space into ‘domestic’ and ‘foreign’ spaces” can create an “us versus them” mentality (p. 65). We can see today that many of us feel a separation from our global neighbors because of borders. We use borders to divide our identities by nationality.
And yet, we also see new systems of global governance with transnational agencies like the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEN). We also see a growing trend toward international governance through bodies like the United Nations (UN), NATO, WTO, and OECD. Furthermore, we see the proliferation of international NGOs, or “not-for profit, voluntary citizen’s group[s] that […] address issues in support of the public good” (Leverty, 2022, para. 1). These systems of international collaboration show that political ideologies, actions and institutions are become major global-oriented enterprises, working on an international level for social change.
We also see a convergence of political ideologies and actions across the globe. For example, we see likeminded groups come together in worldwide social movements like #MeToo and Black Lives Matter. Currently, we also see a move toward global solidarity with Iran’s anti-government protest movement, a movement which centers around fighting against “the country’s mandatory hijab covering for women” (KPBS, 2022, para. 7). People in Europe and the US recently have come together in solidarity protests and marches, showing support for the women of Iran and the ability to choice whether to wear the hijab or not. This shows how political sentiments and movements can easily can take on a global character.
Steger (2020) highlights some of the growing debates about politics and globalization. Hyperglobalists point to “the rise of a ‘borderless world’” with political power transferring to global networks (Steger, 2020, p. 67). Hyperglobalists believe that the power of the nation-state is declining, and that in the future, “the main role of government will be to serve as a superconductor for global capitalism” (Steger, 2020, p. 67). In other words, hyperglobalists emphasize how our world is becoming increasingly connected through politics. The assumption that many hyperglobalists have is that this will lead to global politics eventually having more sway than national politics in our daily lives.
On the other hand, globalization skeptics tend to undermine global political forces. They tend to recognize that globalization happens, but often tie the turn toward globalization to particular neoliberal policy decisions during the 1970s-1990s. Globalization skeptics emphasize how “national territory still matters” in political ideologies, actions, and institutions. For this discussion, I want to hear what you think about these two separate positions.
References
KPBS. (2022, October 23). Iran protests spark solidarity rallies in the U.S. and Europe. The Associated Press. https://www.npr.org/2022/10/23/1130775833/iran-protests-rallies-us-europeLinks to an external site.
Leverty, S. (2022). NGOs, the UN and APA. American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/international/united-nations/p…
Steger, M.B. (2020). Globalization: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
Ström, T.E. (2020). Globalization & surveillance. Rowman & Littlefield.
Guiding Questions for Original Post (Part I)
Considering this debate, what do you think? Please reflect upon the questions below. In your original post for this discussion, please respond to at least 2 of the questions below, using evidence, examples, and citations from at least one class textbook to support your ideas:
What is the hyperglobalist position, and how does it emphasize our increasing political connections worldwide?
What is the globalization skeptic position, and how does it focus on national political ideologies, actions, and institutions?
Do you take a hyperglobalist position, or a skeptical position about political globalization? Or, do you relate to Steger (2020), who finds himself somewhere in the middle? Be sure to explain why you hold a specific position.
Why does Steger (2020) highlight the Syrian Refugee Crisis in his discussion of political globalization? Do you agree with his insights here? Why or why not?
Why does Steger (2020) discuss the Trump Administration Family Separation Policies in his discussion of political globalization? Do you agree with his insights here? Why or why not?
In what ways did has emergence of Covid-19 show us our global connectivity? How has Covid-19 shaped processes of globalization?
How has the emergence of Covid-19 revealed our national differences? For example, what are some separate ways that nation-states have dealt with the pandemic? How have our political ideological differences played a role in our pandemic responses?
How have people across the globe expressed solidarity with social movements like #MeToo, Black Lives Matter, and the recent Iranian anti-government protests? Does this reveal a process of hyperglobalization at work? Why or why not?
(Write an original post between 150-250 words in length. You may go over 250 words, but please try to stay as close to this range as possible)
Guiding Questions for Replies to Classmates (Part II)
Finally, please comment on the posts of at least 2 of your classmates. In your replies to other students, identify what you like about their response. Note if you have any common understandings of these concepts. Make parallels between the ideas of your classmates and your own. If you learned something new from a classmate, be sure to note this in your reply. Be sure to be detailed, specific, and remain on topic. Be sure to provide strong rationale for your replies, and to meet the length requirements.
(Write 2 replies to 2 separate classmates. Use at least 75 words in each reply. You may go over 75 words for each reply, but please try to stay as close to this range as possible)
Netiquette Guidelines
Be sure to follow SDCCD Netiquette Guidelines in your original post and your replies to other students. It is also expected that you go beyond stating opinions and use information from the textbook and other reliable academic research sources to back up your ideas. Of course, as stated previously, you must ensure that you cite any outside information that you use to guide your responses.
Citation Guidelines
Note: it is not required that you use outside sources, but I do ask that you incorporate information from at least one of our class textbooks in your post. When you do this, please use APA in-text citations and references.
If you do outside research for this discussion, it is expected that you use citations. When you summarize, paraphrase, or include quotes from the textbook, supplemental readings, internet sites, or other outside materials in your response, be sure to cite your sources with in-text citations & a references list in APA style. If you do not do this, you will lose points on your post.
APA In-text Citations
APA References (to list at the end of your entry)
If you are citing information from your Steger textbook, here is how you can do this in APA style:
In-text citations for direct quotes: (Steger, 2020, p. 40).
In-text citations if paraphrasing/summarizing: (Steger, 2020).
References (to list at the end of your entry): Steger, M. B. (2020). Globalization: A very short introduction, 5th edition. Oxford University Press.
If you are citing information from your Ström textbook, here is how you can do this in APA style:
In-text citations for direct quotes: (Ström, 2020, p. 80).
In-text citations if paraphrasing/summarizing: (Ström, 2020).
References (to list at the end of your entry): Ström, T. E. (2020). Globalization & surveillance. Rowman & Littlefield.
If you are using an electronic version of the textbook without page numbers, feel free to just cite the Chapter for Summary, and the Chapter + Paragraph # for direct quotes:
In-text citations for direct quotes: (Steger, 2020, Chapter 4, para. 20).
In-text citations if paraphrasing/summarizing: (Steger, 2020, Chapter 4).
References (to list at the end of your entry): Steger, M. B. (2020). Globalization: A very short introduction, 5th edition. Oxford University Press please reply to these two students
Hanan
1. What is the globalization skeptic position, and how does it focus on national political ideologies, actions, and institutions?The globalization skeptic position or the critics of globalization questions the benefits and the impact of the global integration of the different economies, cultures, and societies (Steger, 2020). It focuses on national political ideologies, actions, and institutions through policies that prioritize national interests over global integration . They may advocate for protectionist trade policies, regulations to ensure fair labor practices, and measures to safeguard cultural identity. Some skeptics align with nationalist political ideologies that emphasize the importance of preserving and prioritizing the interests of the nation-state over global cooperation and integration. But with that is is also important to recognize views on globalization are very diverse, and while some may be skeptics, others see globalization as an opportunity for progress, cooperation, and development. The debate around globalization involves a complex interplay of economic, cultural, social, and political factors.2. How have people across the globe expressed solidarity with social movements like #MeToo, Black Lives Matter, and the recent Iranian anti-government protests? Does this reveal a process of hyperglobalization at work? Why or why not?People across the world have expressed solidarity with social movements. One of the biggest movements that I have witnessed was the George Floyd incident that led to the Black Lives Matter movement that occurred during 2020. When it comes to expressing solidarity there are different easy in which it could be approached. Such as online and offline actions, as a way to demonstrate a sense of global awareness and interconnectedness. So yes in a way this does reveal a process of hyperglobalization as it brings people together in the worst of times to help make a difference like the radical deterritorialization of politics, rule-making, and governance(Steger, 2020, p. 65). I also wanted to bring up how when people come together we can do much and create the difference that is necessary and needed for us to become one and united. References:Steger, M. B. (2020).
Student 2
2. Soo
Do you take a hyperglobalist position, or a skeptical position about political globalization? Or, do you relate to Steger (2020), who finds himself somewhere in the middle? Be sure to explain why you hold a specific position.According to Steger, hyperglobalizers claim that politics has been powerless due to globalization and that the world has become a ‘borderless world’ (Steger, 2020). They believe that globalization has transformed the world into a single global system and even diminished the role of individual countries and their sovereignty.On the other hand, globalization skeptics argue that globalization can be restricted by local politics (Steger, 2020). They raise doubts about the impact of globalization and believe that national politics continue to play a significant role.I believe both perspectives have a good point. Their arguments can be valid, depending on the circumstances. For example, during the COVID-19 era, the world became smaller and more interconnected because people shared global challenges. The politics and the economy had a significant impact on the world. However, during peaceful times in the world, I believe local politics may have a greater influence on the economy and culture.In what ways did has emergence of Covid-19 show us our global connectivity? How has Covid-19 shaped processes of globalization?COVID-19 had a significant impact globally and showed us global connectivity. I remember when COVID-19 first broke out in Korea, my friend who was in the USA told me to be careful because I was in Korea. However, it only took a few months for the number of COVID-19 patients in the United States to surpass those in Korea. The rapid spread of COVID-19 shows us how globally interconnected we are. Nowadays, any global issue can become our problem because of global connectivity.COVID-19 also had economic impacts globally. Lockdowns and restrictions caused disruptions in global supply chains. This had an influence on the manufacturing and distribution of products, resulting in a supply shortage. As a result, COVID-19 had an impact on national trade and the worldwide financial markets. According to Steger, hyperglobalizers, who believe the world is now very interconnected and interdependent, “argue that nation-states have already lost their dominant role in the global economy” (Steger, 2020, p. 67). This seems to be true during the pandemic era, because during the pandemic era, the global economy was affected worldwide, and COVID-19 played a significant role in the global economy.