Overview In the assignment, you will consider how leaders and managers view and

Overview
In the assignment, you will consider how leaders and managers view and practice multidisciplinary collaboration.
Instructions
Support the following with relevant academic, scholarly, peer-reviewed resources:
Compare the different ways leaders versus managers implement multidisciplinary collaboration.
For leaders, how might multidisciplinary collaboration be considered as part of an organization’s mission and vision?
For managers, what needs to be considered to effectively promote multidisciplinary collaboration?
Explain how leaders and managers must collaborate to promote multidisciplinary collaboration.
How does the vision and goal of multidisciplinary collaboration relate to the implementation of it?
Compare how two different leadership styles view and justify multidisciplinary collaboration.
For example, how might an authoritative leader view multidisciplinary collaboration compared to a participative one?
Analyze aspects of multidisciplinary collaboration between disciplines.
How might different professional perspectives influence collaboration?
What might be different if multidisciplinary collaboration incorporates interorganizational collaboration (professionals working within different organizations) compared to professionals from different disciplines working within one organization (such as in a hospital)?
Additional Requirements
Your assignment should also meet the following requirements:
Written communication:
Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.
Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.
References: Include at least two references per page from journals, a textbook, or a course reading.
Be sure to find, evaluate, and discuss relevant academic, scholarly, peer-reviewed sources for your assessment using the Reviewing the LiteratureLinks to an external site. Campus page.
APA formatting: Headings that define the sections of the paper, resources, and citations are formatted according to APA style and formatting. See the Advanced Doctoral LearnersLinks to an external site. section of the Writing Center for guidance.
Length of paper: 6–8 typed, double-spaced pages, excluding the cover page and references.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12-point.
ePortfolio
You may choose to save your coursework to your ePortfolioLinks to an external site. as you complete iterations of your work.
Review the Leadership and Management Philosophy and Practices for Multidisciplinary Collaboration rubric before submission.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Analyze leadership theories and models that inform leadership practice.
Compare how two different leadership styles view and justify multidisciplinary collaboration.
Competency 3: Describe collaboration strategies that leaders can use to build effective multidisciplinary collaboration.
Compare the different ways leaders versus managers implement multidisciplinary collaboration.
Explain how leaders and managers must collaborate to promote multidisciplinary collaboration
Analyze aspects of multidisciplinary collaboration between disciplines.
Competency 5: Synthesize scholarly sources and evidence to support credible, compelling arguments.
Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.
Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.
View RubricLeadership and Management Philosophy and Practices for Multidisciplinary CollaborationLeadership and Management Philosophy and Practices for Multidisciplinary CollaborationCriteriaRatingsPtsCompare the different ways leaders versus managers implement multidisciplinary collaboration.40 to >34 ptsDISTINGUISHEDCompares the different ways leaders versus managers implement multidisciplinary collaboration, and supports with real-world organizational examples.34 to >28 ptsPROFICIENTCompares the different ways leaders versus managers implement multidisciplinary collaboration.28 to >0 ptsBASICIdentifies, but does not compare the different ways leaders versus managers implement multidisciplinary collaboration.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not identify the different ways leaders versus managers implement multidisciplinary collaboration./ 40 ptsExplain how leaders and managers must collaborate to promote multidisciplinary collaboration40 to >34 ptsDISTINGUISHEDAnalyzes how leaders and managers must collaborate to promote multidisciplinary collaboration using scholarly articles.34 to >28 ptsPROFICIENTExplains how leaders and managers must collaborate to promote multidisciplinary collaboration.28 to >0 ptsBASICIdentifies, but does not explain how leaders and managers must collaborate to promote multidisciplinary collaboration.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not identify how leaders and managers must collaborate to promote multidisciplinary collaboration./ 40 ptsCompare how two different leadership styles view and justify multidisciplinary collaboration.40 to >34 ptsDISTINGUISHEDCompares how several different leadership styles view and justify multidisciplinary collaboration, and supports using scholarly articles.34 to >28 ptsPROFICIENTCompares how two different leadership styles view and justify multidisciplinary collaboration.28 to >0 ptsBASICIdentifies, but does not compare how two different leadership styles view and justify multidisciplinary collaboration.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not identify how two different leadership styles view and justify multidisciplinary collaboration./ 40 ptsAnalyze aspects of multidisciplinary collaboration between disciplines.40 to >34 ptsDISTINGUISHEDAnalyzes aspects of multidisciplinary collaboration between disciplines, and supports with real-world organizational examples.34 to >28 ptsPROFICIENTAnalyzes aspects of multidisciplinary collaboration between disciplines.28 to >0 ptsBASICDescribes, but does not analyze aspects of multidisciplinary collaboration between disciplines.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not describe aspects of multidisciplinary collaboration between disciplines./ 40 ptsConvey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.20 to >17 ptsDISTINGUISHEDConveys clear purpose, in a tone and style well-suited to the intended audience. Supports assertions, arguments, and conclusions with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards, including APA style and formatting.17 to >14 ptsPROFICIENTConveys purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.14 to >0 ptsBASICConveys purpose, in an appropriate tone or style. Clear, effective communication is inhibited by insufficient supporting evidence or minimal adherence to applicable writing standards.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and writing scholarly standards./ 20 ptsApply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.20 to >17 ptsDISTINGUISHEDApplies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to stylistic conventions, document structure, and source attributions.17 to >14 ptsPROFICIENTApplies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.14 to >0 ptsBASICApplies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing incorrectly and/or inconsistently, detracting noticeably from good scholarship.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing/ 20 ptsTotal Points: 0